← I.2.1 I.2.3 →

I.2.2

2/2/2021

This post is mostly straight math. Feel free to skip this post if you only like squiggly math.

SOME NOTES TO MYSELF BEFORE BEGINNING:
I covered some of the cases of Z(α) = ∅ in the previous post. Note that, in (ii), the   --
√ α = S case DOESN'T break the homogenous Nullstellensatz, whereas the √ α- = S + COULD break the homogenous Nullstellensatz.

Also, in the previous post, I supposed that the degree of 0 in S = k[x0,x1,…,xn] ought to be 0. Oddly, it appears that this isn't the case. It appears that 0 transcends degree. See condition (ii) in this exercise. The ideal √ α- can be equal to S+, which contains NO zero degree elements. And yet, since √ α- is an ideal, we must have 0 ∈√ α- i.e. 0 ∈ S+. So 0 is in the positive degree part of S. However. S0 itself is the same as k, and certainly 0 ∈ k. so 0 ∈ S0. So it's in the zero degree part of S as well. SO, basically, you can't put a degree on 0. I'll keep that in mind, I guess.

OKAY NOTES FIN. LET'S BEGIN.

(i) =⇒ (ii):

Let f ∈ S be homogenous positive degree. Then vacuously ∀P ∈ Z(α) : f(P) = 0 (since (i) says Z(α) = ∅). By the homgenous Nullstellensatz (2.1), fq ∈ α for some q > 0 i.e. f ∈√ α- .

Thus, we've established that S+ ⊂√ α- .

CASE 1: 1 ∈ α
Then α = S.

CASE 2: 1∕∈α
Then certainly 1∕∈√ α- (else 1q = 1 ∈ α, a contradiction). But if 1∕∈√ α- then c∈∕√ α- for any nonzero constant c ∈ k (otherwise we'd have c⋅1
 c = 1 ∈ α, a contradiction). I.e. ∀c ∈ S0 : c∕∈√ --
  α . So √ --
  α must be contained in S+. I.e. √ --
  α ⊂ S +.

DONE.

(ii) =⇒ (iii):

CASE 1: √ --
  α = S
Then 1 ∈√ --
  α , which means that 1q ∈ α for some q, but this just means that 1 ∈ alpha i.e. α = S. But S ⊃ Sd. CASE 1 DONE.

CASE 2: √ --
  α = S +:
Suppose THIS were true:

          k   k      k
∃k  > 0 : x0,x 1,...,xn ∈ α
(1)


(we're working in Pn by the way lol)
(also, shouldn't have used k cause that usually refers to the field but fuck it too late lol)
Then for d = k(n + 1), consider Sd.
Let cx0k0x1k1⋅⋅⋅xnkn be an arbitrary term of Sd.
We have to have k0 + k1 + ⋅⋅⋅ + kn = d, which means that we have to have ki >=k for at least one i. Assume without loss of generality that i = 0. Then we can rewrite that arbitrary term by factoring out an x0k:
x0k(cx0k0-kx1k1⋅ ⋅⋅xnkn)
But this guy is actually in α, since x0k ∈ α (by (1)) and x0k ⋅ f ∈ α for any f ∈ S (since α is an ideal). So we basically showed that an arbitrary element of S0 is in α. I.e. we showed S0 ⊂ α.
To finish off case 2, we just need to show that (1) is true. Since √ --
  α = S by assumption, we must have x0,…,xn ∈√ --
  α . I.e. for each i = 0,…,n, we have ximi ∈ α for some mi > 0. But then certainly xim0m1⋅⋅⋅mi⋅⋅⋅mn ∈ α. (e.g. (x0m0)m1⋅⋅⋅mn ∈ α, etc.).
CASE 2 DONE.

(iii) =⇒ (i):

We're given α ⊃ Sd. Taking Z(⋅) of both sides, we reverse the inclusion, yielding

Z(α ) ⊂ Z(Sd )
(2)

But since x0d,x1d,…,xnd ∈ Sd, a point P would have to be all 0 in order to be 0 at all of these (since k is an integral domain!) and this can't happen in Pn, so we actually have Z(Sd) = ∅. So by (2), Z(α) ⊂∅ i.e. Z(α) = ∅.